Advance decisions: worth the paper they are (not) written on?

Richard Huxtable

  • Abstract

    Law and policy in England and Wales permit individuals to set down, in advance of future incapacity, their wishes as to what medical treatment they would want—and, particularly, not want—to receive in the future. A House of Lords Select Committee has, however, recently found that the reality of advance decision-making does not match the theory. In this article, I consider eight problems with the practice and the theory, which suggest that so-called ‘advance directives’ can be non-existent, uninformed, imprecise, unavailable, inadequate, unpredictable, unauthoritative and illegitimate. I nevertheless conclude that many—maybe all—of the problems can be overcome, such that advance decision-making need not be so problematic after all.

  • Contributors

    Richard Huxtable

    Affiliations

    Correct at article publish date

    Centre for Ethics in Medicine, School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK

    Author notes

    Correspondence to Professor Richard Huxtable, R.Huxtable@bristol.ac.uk

    Original publishing information

    • Publisher: St Christopher's Hospice
    • Publish date: 01/09/2015
    • ePub Date: 25/09/2015
    • Volume: 5
    • Issue: 1

    Permissions: Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions2015

  • Downloads

Full article access

To download and read the full article you need to log in

Not yet registered? Registration is free and easy.

Register online now

St Christopher's education events

Dementia

Providing good end of life care to people with dementia

Find out more